POTSDAM It may be time to abolish the villages employee residency requirement, according to Mayor Steven W. Yurgartis.
There are four full-time employees required to live in the village: Village Administrator David H. Fenton, Clerk/Treasurer Lori S. Queor, Police Chief Kevin A. Bates and Planning and Development Director Frederick J. Hanss. Elected officials also are required to live in the village, Mr. Yurgartis said.
Mr. Fenton, Ms. Queor and Mr. Bates all had previously received exemptions from the village board, enabling them to live outside Potsdam. Monday night, the village board voted 4-1, with Trustee Ruth F. Garner dissenting, to allow Mr. Hanss to move outside of the village, too.
When he was hired by the village several years ago, a stipulation in Mr. Hansss contract required him to find a village residence within his first two years of employment. In May 2007, Mr. Hanss petitioned unsuccessfully to have that two-year window extended by six months. To keep his job, he began leasing a house within the village.
Mr. Hanss declined comment late Wednesday afternoon, calling it a personnel matter. Mr. Yurgartis said Mr. Hanss wanted to move into a home his family owns in Hannawa Falls.
Circumstances had changed since the board forced Mr. Hanss to either choose to live in the village or lose his job, Mr. Yurgartis said.
It doesnt make sense for him to maintain two residences, Mr. Yurgartis said.
Mrs. Garner said she dissented as a matter of principle. Mr. Hansss promise to live in the village gave him an edge over other candidates during the hiring process several years ago, she said. He should continue to keep that promise.
On principle, I think people should keep their word, she said. Weve all gotten too casual about promising things.
Mr. Hansss exemption means all non-elected officials bound to the requirement are now exempt from it. It may make more sense to do without it, Mr. Yurgartis said.
I think this is a rule we ought to look at as a board and decide whether we want to keep it on the books, he said. We want to hire the best possible people and residency should be a secondary consideration, in my opinion.
Mr. Bates, for example, had just finished building a house outside the village before taking his new job.
He said very candidly, I will not move from this house just to be able to take the chiefs job. That seems reasonable to me, Mr. Yurgartis said. It just doesnt make sense to turn him down because of that residency requirement.
There may be a reason why the residency requirement exists, but its probably very old, Mr. Yurgartis said.
There may have been a time many years ago when it made sense, he said. Its just something thats been lingering. ... Weve been just giving exemptions rather than sitting down and changing the law.
Mrs. Garner said she would consider abolishing the rule, but only if its done the right way. Back in the 1980s, Potsdams unionized employees had to live within eight miles of the village, Mr. Fenton said. That rule has since been abolished.
They found that eight miles didnt comply with the law, he said.
Mr. Fenton, who lives in Norwood, said eliminating the rule made sense.
If the corporate world worked that way, they would have trouble finding people, he said. You find it limits the potential pool of candidates for a job.